Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Islamonazi president of Iran, looks out on the Muslim Umma, or nation, and what does he see? The Caliphate, dissolved in 1924, is now a distant memory. Ever since, Islam has been leaderless, rudderless. Everywhere, Muslim populations suffer under the depredations of their autocratic Muslim rulers. Sunnis hate Shiites, Shiites hate Sunnis, and both mistrust Sufis. The Umma is chopped up into rump nation-states, most of them created by European colonial powers in the period following World War I. In Iraq and Afghanistan, Muslims labor under occupation by a coalition of mainly Christian nations, led by the Great Satan. In Palestine, Muslims seem helpless in the face of Israeli power and their own monumental incompetence. Even in Europe, the Muslims form a community of bottom feeders, a permanent underclass valued for its manual labor but loathed for its inability to assimilate. The backwardness, general poverty, division and failure of the Umma has made it the laughingstock of the world.
At the same time, Ahmadinejad believes that he has been anointed as a prophet of the Mahdi, the Muslim messiah prophesied to appear at the end of time and usher in a millennium of peace based on universal adherence to Islam. No doubt Ahmadinejad has memorized the 8th Century prophecy attributed to the 6th Shi’a Imam, Jafar al-Sadiq: “Before the appearance of the one who will rise, peace be upon him, the people will be reprimanded for their acts of disobedience by a fire that will appear in the sky and a redness that will cover the sky. It will swallow up Baghdad, and will swallow up Kufa. Their blood will be shed and houses destroyed. Death will occur amid their people and a fear will come over the people of Iraq from which they shall have no rest.” To Ahmadinejad, the current agony in Iraq must appear to be irrefutable confirmation of the prophecy, driving him deeper into his apocalyptic fantasy of an imminent eschatological denouement.
Given his role as the Mahdi’s John the Baptist, Ahmadinejad feels a heavy responsibility to begin preparing the world for the arrival of the “perfect human being.” He will start with the Umma, which must be restored to unanimity of purpose. But how to begin? Ahmadinejad is well-read in history and he is a master of human psychology. He knows that nothing galvanizes identity and generates unanimity like the threat of the Other, the Stranger. He decides that the nearest historical parallel is the Weimar Republic, when the nation of Germany, like the Umma today, lay prostrate and humiliated before the world. He concludes that the Other then can be the Other now, with perhaps the same power to generate social consensus and the unity that flows from it. By immolating the Other, perhaps Ahmadinejad, like Hitler before him, can refound a culture that has grown weak and defeated. He cold-cranks the scapegoating mechanism and discovers to his pleasure that the lubricant coating its wheels and levers retains its original viscosity. To his great surprise, he also finds that many fellow-workers, some from quite unexpected and formerly hostile places, have enthusiastically joined him in restarting the ancient engine, leaving only one question:
Will it turn over?
Missing from the national discussion of the Obama administration's disgraceful decision is the threat to other Manhattan locations--the possibilities, for example, of car-bomb attacks on crowded Midtown streets or in poorly protected, Upper East Side, high-rise apartment building parking garages, suicide bombers on subway trains or buses, and Mumbai-style swarming attacks on restaurants and stores, schools and nursing homes, and other soft targets elsewhere on the island or in the city's other boroughs.
Suburban cities and towns--and commuter rail lines--will also be targets. The Islamonazi enemy can be expected to go to any and all possible lengths to carry out the most vicious acts of revenge and hostage-taking on U.S. soil with a focus on the New York metropolitan area.
In other words, the Obama administration, which refers to terrorist attacks as "manmade disasters," is creating a manmade catastrophe.
It is up to the U.S. Congress to prevent it from happening.
POSTSCRIPT: Nearly 60% of U.S. voters favor waterboarding the captured Islamonazi terrorist--a young, Al Qaeda-connected man from an affluent Nigerian family--who tried to blow up a U.S. airliner on Christmas Day. Click here for the story. Obama has referred to the enemy alien as a "suspect."
PPS: Did KSM also confess to being involved in the bombing of TWA Flight 800? Click here for that story.
He is off the wall. Mad with power. Even if you think this, if you are President of the United States, you don't say it. Read this story and then consider the gala event he held at the White House for Ramadan; Atlas Shrugs covered it here. And remember Obama's cancellation of the national day of prayer.
Obama Plan 'Non-Religious Christmas' at WH FOX
President Obama and the First Family were planning a “non-religious
Christmas,” according to Social Secretary Desiree Rogers. Ms. Rogers reportedly told a gathering of former social secretaries that the Obamas did not intend on putting the Nativity scene on display – a longtime East Room tradition.
Here's the rest......

Whatever the case, if it actually makes its way before a jury, it promises to be a trial like no other in memory, an extraordinary clash involving the morality of torture, due process rights of foreign terrorist operatives, and the ability of civilian courts to handle national security cases.
Mr. Mohammed and his four co-defendants in military custody have admitted their active involvement in plotting the Sept. 11 attacks and have boasted of their success in killing 3,000 people.
Once the Justice Department brings formal terrorism charges against him, Mr. Mohammed could seek to enter a guilty plea, just as he has tried to do in military custody.
But legal analysts were not convinced that he would go that route and said that he might instead seek to martyr himself in the eyes of Muslim extremists through a grand and lengthy trial.
“There’s reason to believe he will try to take advantage of a public platform — more public than Guantánamo afforded him — to publicize his jihadist views,” said David H. Laufman, a Washington lawyer and former federal terrorism prosecutor.
In fact, one question will be how a judge will prevent a trial from turning into a forum on the American war on terrorism, including the Bush administration’s interrogation policies. Terrorism defendants in lesser-known trials have given rambling speeches condemning the government.
One thing you can give our media Chattering Classes: They are utterly consistent. After Major Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire on a roomful of defenseless people in Fort Hood, it was absolutely assured that we would immediately be told that this outrage had nothing to do with his Islamic faith and that it was not an act of terror. Then, as time went on and the bleedin’ obvious became bleedin’ obvious, we would spend all weekend enduring TV pundits scratching the $200 haircuts on their 88-cent heads and pondering the question of whether there might be some remote connection between Islamic belief and a guy who praises Muslim suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, sits under the teaching of a Radical Islamic imam who praises his act of slaughter as heroic, uses his authority as a psychiatrist to proselytize vulnerable patients with Islamic agitprop, and dresses in traditional Muslim garb and shouts “Allahu akbar!” as he guns down his prey.
You’ll want to read the whole thing.
Victor Davis Hanson is a military historian; Robert Baer a former CIA field officer. Both have studied the Middle East for decades, traveled to the area repeatedly in recent years and written about the region extensively. And both have become convinced that we may be facing a cataclysm.
Hanson and Baer each presented his analysis during an interview this past week. Although they differ on certain matters, they agree on five observations. The first: If not already capable of doing so, Iran will be able to produce nuclear weapons in mere months.
Baer noted that Iran's scientific and technical capacity is impressive. The country may very well be able to produce enough enriched uranium for several nuclear weapons on its own. If not, Iran can obtain enriched uranium in other ways. "The Iranians are very good at procuring banned materials very easily," said Baer. "They are very close [to having what they need to produce weapons]. They could move very quickly."
How quickly?
"Six months, a year."
The second observation: The Iranians have no interest in running a bluff. Once able to produce nuclear weapons, they will almost certainly do so.
"We see Iran as the power in the region," Hanson said. "But when Iran looks at the region, it sees danger everywhere." In Iraq, a democratic government has achieved stability, which can only incite the dissident movement in Iran. In Lebanon, Hezbollah, Iran's client, has failed in its attempt to capture control of the country, finding itself contained and marginalized instead. The Sunni states of Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt and the emirates look upon Iran, a Shia state, with sectarian hostility.
"The Iranians, think, 'My gosh, we are in an unstable position,' " Hanson said. "'Maybe a bomb or two will allow us to do what Pakistan has done. Maybe it will allow us to achieve some autonomy.'"
The third observation: As the Iranians scramble to produce nuclear weapons, the Obama administration appears too feckless, inexperienced or deluded to stop them.
Already, the administration has committed two errors. Last summer, when millions of Iranians took to the streets to protest their country's corrupt presidential election, it failed to encourage the protesters, merely looking on. "Obama could have said to the Iranian people, 'We support your legitimate concerns over constitutional government,'" Hanson argued. "Instead he was saying, 'Let's wait and see who wins.' It did not look good."
Then last month the Obama administration announced that the U.S. no longer planned to deploy anti-missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic. These emplacements, which the Bush administration had promised, would have protected Eastern Europe against long-range missiles from Iran. The Obama administration canceled the anti-missile defenses to please Russia, hoping that Russia would pressure Iran in return. "Russia is never going to help," Hanson said. "Tension in the Gulf would raise oil prices, helping Russia. Anything that causes the United States problems, Putin is for."
What options does the administration still possess? "We could get the Europeans to immediately stop exporting gas to Iran," Hanson explained. "We could have some kind of blockade of the Persian Gulf. We are talking about very serious things. But they would put pressure on Iran, ostracizing it." Will President Obama pursue such options? Does he possess the political will? Hanson and Baer doubted it. "We have a president who likes to be liked," Hanson said.
The fourth observation: Israel cannot tolerate a nuclear Iran.
"The Israelis have some bunker busters," Baer said. "They could take out some sites underground. They could set the Iranian nuclear program back years." Would the Israelis be willing to accept the risks a military strike would entail? "This is just 65 years after the Holocaust," Hanson said. "My God, we are talking about 6 million people who were executed while the world watched, and now we have a person [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran] who is promising to do it again."
What is the probability that Israel will strike Iran within the next six months?
"Forty-nine percent," said Baer.
"I would say 50-50," Hanson replied.
The final observation: Iran would retaliate.
"Iran's deterrent doctrine is to strike back everywhere it can," Baer explained. "We should expect the worst." Iran would attack American supply lines in Iraq and command Hezbollah to start a civil war in Lebanon. It would fire surface-to-surface missiles at every oil facility within range, wreaking devastation in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states while removing millions of barrels of oil a day from the world markets. The economy of the entire globe would suffer a paroxysm. The Middle East could descend into chaos. The U.S. would experience the worst crisis in decades.
After the assassination 95 years ago of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the great powers of Europe engaged in meaningless diplomatic maneuvers. "Austria has sent a bullying and humiliating ultimatum to Serbia, who cannot possibly comply with it," British Prime Minister Herbert Asquith confided in a letter. "[W]e are in measurable, or at least imaginable, distance of a real Armageddon."
A big nation attempting to humiliate a small nation in a way the small nation simply cannot accept. Unseriousness among great powers. A gathering sense of impending catastrophe. Once again, it may be Armageddon time.
Look for other groups to get on board.
Fearless prediction...Obama will be named the MVP of the World Series and the Super Bowl. He will win an Oscar and be named Homecoming King and Queen at several high schools and colleges across the country.
Oh and remember the university that wouldn't give him a lousy honorary degree....right here in good 'ol land of the racists in Arizona..... because he hadn't done anything yet? I can only imagine how stupid and racist they feel today. Now that I think of it, I'm pretty sure I heard people chanting "Boy" during his commencement speech.
"BREAKING: Obama named Motor Trend's Car of the Year!"
I see an ESPY just around the corner for Obama.
This just in.....
Obama has just won the Heisman.

Just received word that Barry won the Stanley Cup...
As Obama was driving to pick up his Nobel Peace Prize, he accidentally won the NASCAR Sprint Cup.

Obama threw 984 touchdowns and rushed for 3.8 brazilian yards, leading the Kenyan Unicorns to their first Super Bowl victory. Well done, Captain Awesome.

While you were getting another cup of coffee, Obama won the Tour de France
The cruelest, most violent Samurai in Japan decides he wants to become enlightened. He bursts into the home of an esteemed Zen Master and demands that the Master teach him how to become enlightened.
The Zen Master looks deeply into his eyes and says, “No. You are a dirty, vicious Samurai. I will not teach you.”
Enraged, the Samurai yanks out his sword and places it right at the Zen Master’s neck. He hollers, “Do you have any idea who I am? I am the cruelest Samurai in the world. I can cut your throat and not blink an eye.”
Without skipping a beat, the Master calmly responds, “Do you have any idea who I am? I can let you slit my throat and not blink an eye.”
The Samurai falls to his knees, sobbing, overcome by the presence of a man mightier than his sword.
I get the impression that President Obama would like very much to say to those Americans and traditional allies who are not falling for him, “Do you know who I am?”
I wish he would, because the response would be: “Do you know who you are?”
This piece by Robin of Berkeley, which includes the Zen story, describes an America that is holding its collective breath, and wondering just who it actually elected back in November of 2008.
One senses that the nation is not alone in wondering, that perhaps President Obama himself has no clue who he is, not as an American man, and not as The American President. For decades Obama has gotten by on elegance, a retiring demeanor and the ability to make people see their reflections in him. The first two are gifts; that last is a symptom of a vast emptiness, for a mirror may have width, but not depth.
If Barack Obama, who has made a great secret of his past, truly understood who he is, and who The American President is on the world stage, he would never have journeyed to Copenhagen to have his hat handed to him.
Raised off the mainland, living for a time as a “Jakarta street kid” in Indonesia (where, he told the New York Times’ Nicholas Kristoff -before the remark was scrubbed- that the Muslim call to prayer was “the prettiest sound,” in the world), Obama is an American President who is not particularly American in character or disposition. He seems not to really understand Americans, or their way -which is a way peculiar to the rest of the word, at once shallow and heroic, capable of great materialism and breathtaking self-sacrifice.
There is nothing wrong with thinking a call to prayer a beautiful thing, but someone thought Obama had revealed too much of himself in that remark, and so it has been stricken from the public record, like so much of Obama’s past. And a man without a past, like an amnesiac, is a man who knows nothing about himself, or the world in which he moves.
The American mind is a duality of sorts. A country founded by displaced nobles and built by the strongest and most resourceful commoners from around the globe, America’s can-do attitude is one that doesn’t mind looking out for the little guy, as long as his own share is a fair one, and his options are open. The American mind is constantly dreaming; even her most newly-arrived immigrants dream, because until very recently all dreams were pronounced “welcome,” and the greatest restrictions were the ones you put upon yourself, or allowed others to put upon you. The dreaming made us exceptional; the dreams made us indispensable.
Bot does Obama understand those dreams? If he does not, then in truth he does not understand the people he undertook to govern. He appears to have decided that “governing” could be accomplished with an endless campaign, meant to entertain a nation enthralled with hucksterism and side-shows; that notion betrays, in meaningful measure, a disdain for the people who placed their trust in him, with their vote.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
— The Art of Warfare
Whether he meant to entertain or to rule like a monarch, Obama seems now petrified to actually lead. One senses that this unformed man is at war with himself; what to do – play to the handlers and their agenda, or cast them aside, grasp both sides of the podium, swallow hard, and play to history?
The Office of the Presidency can either make a man great, or break him, but it will not allow him to coast and remain undefined.
But a lack of definition is what Obama has cultivated throughout adult life. From what little we know of his college days to his Inaugural speech, others have defined Obama for him, going mostly by what they saw – which was usually a reflection of themselves. He has kept himself safely tucked away, voting “present,” both early and often.
The forced definition of the American Presidency is sitting very uncomfortably with Barack Obama. There is nowhere to hide; there are no further personae to be invented and presented. The Jekyll and Hyde who has been singing endless encores of “This is the Moment” to America for nearly three years, has finally come upon a real moment, an authentic crossroad: he must now materialize into a defined entity with a known vector. Will that entity choose to define himself by a willingness to help a nation of free and energetic dreamers sustain the most exceptional and productive dream in history? Or will it choose to remain the poorly-marked outline of an aching, light-consuming void, delivering nothing but silence?
Until Barak Obama decides who he is, we cannot know him, and he cannot know America. And until he knows America, he cannot begin to understand the good-faith majority of us, who are longing not for a god, not for a king, but for a president worthy of our trust.
The voluntarily dissolved American press may be willing to throw the country away for the sake of protecting and hiding a single man whose glories they mistake for their own, but like Obama, his elitist minions do not know who we are.
They never have. Working from outdated templates, all the incurious press have ever known of us are the media-drawn caricatures that they, in their laziness, mistake for a genuine likeness.
But because they do not know us, in the end they will not be able to defeat us.
Q: “Do you know who we are? We are the government that can take away your liberty, your dreams, your very American-ness.”
A: If you knew who we were, you would know that is impossible.
Even if a thing looks like victory on the surface, an unknown opponent can never be defeated. One greater than we, and greater than this crew currently in power in the world, taught that long ago.
We Americans may not know President Obama, but we know ourselves; we know who we are. That gives us a distinct advantage over those in government know neither us, nor themselves.
Barack Obama, who has expressed ambivalence about the notion of victory, needs to first win the battle within himself, if he is to help America dare to shake off a threatening nightmare and begin, again, to dream.
If he can do that, he will be great. If he cannot, his own defeat will be a bitter, deep, personal and lasting thing.
More Barkley: “You can see a lot this stuff going on with President Obama right now. Everybody is going crazy talking about his spending. It's so funny, he's not spending any more money than George Bush did, and there was not this hatred and animosity toward him."Charles Barkley is a bit off on his numbers.
”And he didn't take over in the middle of a recession and with two monstrous wars going on. George Bush spent like crazy. But there is some animosity that is racially motivated toward Barack, and it's sad.”
